Re: Polypaudio action plan

[Lennart Poettering <mztabzr 0pointer de>]

On Wed, 24.11.04 19:32, Seth Nickell (snickell redhat com) wrote:

> 
> > Yes - the point I might have been making is that many
> > distributions probably will stay with esound, even though GNOME
> > "reccommends" a better alternative (and thus far, no-one has said
> > that polypaudio is worse than esound, and lots of people have
> > said it's better).
> 
> What I don't want is to include polypaudio in such a way that people
> write directly to it (the same way as libgnome etc currently directly
> use esound). 

Not a single message in the whole discussion suggested that people
should start using polypaudio's API directly for normal applications.

Lennart

-- 
name { Lennart Poettering } loc { Hamburg - Germany }
mail { mzft (at) 0pointer (dot) de } gpg { 1A015CC4 }  
www { http://0pointer.de/lennart/ } icq# { 11060553 }