Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft



On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 15:46 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
[snip]
> what is most unfortunate is that library.g.o only has glib development
> docs, but not gtk development docs.

That's probably because there are no tarball releases of GTK+ from svn
trunk at the moment. library.gnome.org can only use tarballs, I believe.

>  having development docs readily
> available is fairly important to talk about new stuff and get reviewers
> interest. (building those can easily be automated via buildign the
> gtk+.module jhbuild module.)

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]