Re: Nautilus usability and nit-picks

On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 23:00, Shahms E. King wrote:

> That is, I believe, how it currently is.  But this behavior becomes
> unexpected and counter-intuitive in the case of, say, NFS, because this
> is mounted as a part of the local filesystem and the fact that it isn't
> really local should not be visible to the user.  However, if you were to
> access that same export via, say, nfs://server/path THEN copy rather
> than move would make sense.  

How about "user mountable and remote filesystems"?

Though one should just think of the whole thing in terms of file
management tasks and why it should behave in a certain way in certain


:: :: Tuomas Kuosmanen  :: Art Director, Ximian :: ::
:: :: tigert ximian com ::       :: ::

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]