Re: gtkhtml2 vs. gtkhtml1

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 14:23, Ali Akcaagac wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 19:58, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > No, that's not the issue at all. As was stated earlier, any app
> > currently using GtkHTML2 is not going to break if we decide not to
> > continue development on it.
> <rant>
> isn't it amusing to see how much ximian employees tactically hide well
> choosen sentences into their replies for not sounding offending etc. but
> still saying that they like gtkhtml1 seeing in favor of gtkhtml2.

Well, here's a ximian employee tactlessly writing a badly chosen

stop being an asshole.  If I here one more conspiracy theory out of you
I'm going to fucking flip out.


> quote:
> - 'when WE go and implement css into gtkhtml1'
> - 'if WE decide not to continue development on it (gtkhtml2)'
> - 'gtkhtml2 has a number of issues, as previously discussed'
> </rant>
> well now let's count the values as we learned it in first class. for
> sure you understand that:
> - i personally like to see gtkhtml2 staying alive in favor of gtkhtml1.
> - i would like to see gtkhtml2 beeing developed on and mature as khtml.
> - i don't care if it has editor capabilities or not since i am
>   interested in it's rendering interface only.
> no offense...
> -- 
> Name....: Ali Akcaagac
> Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science
> E-Mail..: mailto:ali akcaagac stud fh-wilhelmshaven de
> WWW.....:
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devel-list mailing list
> gnome-devel-list gnome org
Dave Camp <dave ximian com>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]