Re: Fwd: Plans for GTK+ Bundles for win32 and =?UTF-8?Q?win=36=34=3F?=
- From: Jernej Simončič <jernej|s-gmane eternallybored org>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Plans for GTK+ Bundles for win32 and win64?
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:47:14 +0200
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:49:55 +0200, dieterv wrote:
> No need to fiddle with %PATH% when your executable lives right next
> to libglib-2.0.dll, libgtk-2.0.dll etc. In other words, put your .exe
> and .dll's in the bin directory. Have a look at how GIMP does things,
> it's a fine example of how to package things for Windows in a sane way.
No, Gimp definitely isn't a good example - just try dropping an old version
of intl.dll to your System32 directory (like a certain well-known antivirus
seems to do). If you do it before you ran Gimp for the first time, you'll
get to click away some 150 message boxes complaining about missing exports.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]