Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- From: Michael Gratton <mike vee net>
- To: Ernestas Kulik <ernestask gnome org>
- Cc: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan vanberkom codethink co uk>, Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 23:24:06 +1000
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 14:32, Ernestas Kulik <ernestask gnome org>
wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 21:38 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
After deliberately setting out to make the project more inclusive,
Python has reversed a five-year-long trend of declining number of
core
devs and it has been increasing ever since. They have for example,
in
the last three years gone from having 0 to 4 women who are core
devs.
They have also been successful in getting other projects to use more
inclusive language. For example, MongoDB initially refused to stop
using the term "master", but then relented after Python did so.
GNOME
could be in a similar position of leadership here, since it's pretty
clear /someone/ needs to be the first to do the right thing to get
others moving as well.
To make a counterpoint: The GNOME Foundation straight up hired women
to
hold positions of leadership, and I don’t remember seeing a big
effort
to become inclusive. Rather, there was “just” someone generous
enough
to donate big money that allowed to get people onboard and pay them
for
their time.
You may have missed then that Outreachy started off as the GNOME
Outreach Program for Women: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outreachy> :)
The Impact section there is a particularly good read about the positive
impact of inclusivity programs, in this case, for women.
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]