Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules



On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 14:32, Ernestas Kulik <ernestask gnome org> wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 21:38 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:

 After deliberately setting out to make the project more inclusive,
 Python has reversed a five-year-long trend of declining number of
 core
 devs and it has been increasing ever since. They have for example,
 in
the last three years gone from having 0 to 4 women who are core devs.

 They have also been successful in getting other projects to use more
 inclusive language. For example, MongoDB initially refused to stop
 using the term "master", but then relented after Python did so.
 GNOME
 could be in a similar position of leadership here, since it's pretty
 clear /someone/ needs to be the first to do the right thing to get
 others moving as well.

To make a counterpoint: The GNOME Foundation straight up hired women to hold positions of leadership, and I don’t remember seeing a big effort to become inclusive. Rather, there was “just” someone generous enough to donate big money that allowed to get people onboard and pay them for
their time.

You may have missed then that Outreachy started off as the GNOME Outreach Program for Women: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outreachy> :)

The Impact section there is a particularly good read about the positive impact of inclusivity programs, in this case, for women.

//Mike

--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]