2010-October Archive by Thread
Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
A coming gtk deprecation,
Matthias Clasen
Bump min vala version to 0.11.1,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Google Code-In for GNOME: We Need Tasks! (Reminder),
Andre Klapper
Re: Final GNOME 2.91/3.0 schedule,
Jason Clinton
I cant build mozilla external dependency with jhbuild,
=?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Jard=C3=B3n?=
GTK+ modules loading changes,
Bastien Nocera
Session DBus protocol,
Ryan Lortie
Changes for a11y applications, and AutostartCondition users,
Bastien Nocera
Call for a new Conglomerate maintainer!,
=?UTF-8?B?TWFyaW8gQmzDpHR0ZXJtYW5u?=
(not) proposing Snowy for GNOME 3.0,
Sandy Armstrong
Evince needs shared_mime_info,
Juanjo Marin
Google Code-In for GNOME: We Need Tasks!,
Andre Klapper
New module proposal: LightDM,
Robert Ancell
New modules proposal period for GNOME 3.0 ends this Monday,
Andre Klapper
GNOME 2.91.1 status,
Lucas Rocha
G/tkApplication,
Ryan Lortie
Help make this document complete (default GNOME keyboard shortcuts on wiki),
Mark
libnotify, gtk changes,
Matthias Clasen
Re: Relying on glib to publish gettext linker flags,
Felipe Contreras
gnome-panel -> gtk3,
Jonh Wendell
Planning for the Boston Summit,
Brian Cameron
Re: Requiring XInput for settings-daemon and control-center?,
Bastien Nocera
GNOME 3 external dependency proposal (accounts service),
Ray Strode
GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Kenneth Nielsen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Kenneth Nielsen
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Kenneth Nielsen
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Dimitris Glezos
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Dimitris Glezos
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Dimitris Glezos
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Shaun McCance
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Dimitris Glezos
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
daniel g. siegel
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Sandy Armstrong
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Diego Escalante Urrelo
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Jeff Schroeder
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Claude Paroz
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
daniel g. siegel
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Gil Forcada
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
=?UTF-8?B?U2ViYXN0aWFuIFDDtmxzdGVybA==?=
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Kenneth Nielsen
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
daniel g. siegel
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Emmanuele Bassi
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
daniel g. siegel
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Emmanuele Bassi
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Kenneth Nielsen
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Vincent Untz
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Germ=E1n_P=F3o-Caama=F1o?=
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Petr Kovar
- Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Kenneth Nielsen
Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N,
Claude Paroz
gnome2 and gnome3: strategy of coexisting,
Sergey Udaltsov
Re: GNOME 2.91/3.0 Schedule Draft,
Andre Klapper
package dependencies,
Kevin McKinney
GNOME 2.91.0 Development Release,
Matthias Clasen
Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Vincent Untz
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Sandy Armstrong
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Murray Cumming
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
David Zeuthen
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Jason Clinton
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Bastien Nocera
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Josselin Mouette
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Kenneth Nielsen
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Paolo Borelli
- Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two,
Murray Cumming
GTK3 parallel installable apps,
Stef Walter
2.91.0 status,
Matthias Clasen
splitting up gnome-games,
Colin Walters
New module proposal: Clutter core,
Emmanuele Bassi
Re: JSON-Glib (was: New module proposal: Clutter core),
Ted Gould
Re: New module proposal: Clutter core,
Andre Klapper
New module proposal: libpeas,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Steve_Fr=E9cinaux?=
Please ship changelogs in your tarballs,
Josselin Mouette
Re: Request for GNOME 2.32: Metacity 2.30.2 breaks majority of themes (patch),
Brandon Wright
GNOME 2.91.0 tarballs needed by Monday,
Matthias Clasen
external dependency review for 2.91,
Matthias Clasen
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
=?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Jard=C3=B3n?=
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Filippo Argiolas
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Tim-Philipp =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?=
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Emmanuele Bassi
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Thomas H.P. Andersen
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Arun Raghavan
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Bastien Nocera
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Martyn Russell
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Martyn Russell
- Re: external dependency review for 2.91,
Martyn Russell
Mail converted by MHonArc